Evolution and its Relation to Christianity



                This is probably going to be one of those posts that is going to get me in quite a bit of trouble. Ever since the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, the topic of evolution has been a controversial topic. Before one goes much further though, I feel that evolution must be defined. When evolution is used, it is actually a blanket statement for two specific processes. One of these processes is micro-evolution, which is the optimization of a species through the natural selection for the genes that allow individuals to survive and pass on their genes. The other term is macro-evolution, which is the attempt to use the mechanisms of micro-evolution and natural selection to account for the origin of life.
                So where does religion come into play here? One could start by looking at macro-evolution, as micro-evolution is a really well-defined field and is seen in the world we see today. People could also argue against macro-evolution, which would say that life gradually evolved to become what we see today, by saying that we have not seen the species jump that supposedly happened in the past. Why don’t we see the species change over the years? Darwin’s finches optimized their gene pool and gained longer beaks, shorter wings, etc., but they were still finches.
                One could also use the origin of information here. Intelligence is always inferred when information is found. This is similar to going to Mars and finding a McDonald’s hamburger wrapper. You wouldn’t assume that the wrapper was formed by unguided processes, your first thought would probably be that someone was there before you and brought lunch that was made by intelligent hands. This is one of the basic ideas for the Intelligent Design school of thought. When it comes to information, one must have a mind behind that information for it to have any sort of meaning. This argument gets applied to DNA, which stores all of the information needed to construct any living organism. There have been studies and comments made that DNA stores information as a digital sequence, much like a computer. So if the information in DNA is analogous to a designed computer, why is it a childish conclusion to say that there is a designer? From the gospel of John, “In the beginning was the Word…”. The Word was the Logos, or the reason. God created the universe according to the principles that he saw fit to impose on the universe. This is only a quick blurb from myself and some of it I am using from talks by John Lennox and Ravi Zacharias, so feel free to go to those two’s sites to see their thoughts on the subject. God bless and have a good rest of your week.

Comments

  1. UnknownAugust 15, 2013 at 1:40 PM

    "Ever since the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, the topic of evolution has been a controversial topic."

    It hasn't been a controversial topic in the way you are suggesting for at least 100 years.


    "So where does religion come into play here? One could start by looking at macro-evolution, as micro-evolution is a really well-defined field and is seen in the world we see today. People could also argue against macro-evolution, which would say that life gradually evolved to become what we see today, by saying that we have not seen the species jump that supposedly happened in the past."

    First of all, macro-evolution is the compounding of micro effects. Second of all, unless you're going to be more specific about "the species jump" bit, you haven't made an argument. In any case, you may like to browse this:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils



    "One could also use the origin of information here. Intelligence is always inferred when information is found."

    You're going to have to be more precise about your definition of information, but I can't think of any commonly accepted (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theory) view of information that says that "intelligence should be inferred".


    "This is similar to going to Mars and finding a McDonald’s hamburger wrapper."

    No. No, it isn't. Not even a little bit. Unless you also find other things that are similar but not identical in structure and function and reproduce with minor genetic mutations which are under selective pressures. Also, your McDonald's hamburger wrapper would have to do this for your analogy to make any sense.


    "This is only a quick blurb from myself and some of it I am using from talks by John Lennox and Ravi Zacharias..."

    Lennox (from a quick Google) looks legit, but Zacharias has said that evolution is incompatible with the second law of thermodynamics. I hope you don't buy into that kind of reasoning.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

First post in 2 years, catching up on life, reflections on fatherhood

          To those of you who are still following me and came back to see this post, thank you for stopping in. It has been 2 years since I last posted anything to this page (little over actually since my animal suffering post was July 10, 2021). I fell off writing because my wife and I were going through one of our biggest challenges we have faced, the supposed impending death and miscarriage of our second child, Austin. I say supposed because God is good and Austin survived long odds to not only make it to term, but he is a happy almost 2 year old now. Our daughter Abby is also doing great, almost 4 now, and she loves her brother fiercely. This particular post won’t necessarily be focusing on an apologetics topic (I hope to tackle the origin and uses of different Bible translations soon), I want to do use this post to tell that story of Austin’s miraculous turn around in the womb, and reflect on what all God has shown me and grown me in during almost 4 years of being a father. I to
Read more

Evidence to Support Creation/Intelligent Design

                During my post concerning education, I made comments over how evolution can be taught in a classroom without affecting the worldview of the students. Thanks to the comment from someone on the article, I got to thinking about the opposite side, creationism/intelligent design. How could one introduce these theories and ideas without imposing a worldview on your students? Now unfortunately I cannot think of a way to introduce these views without introducing some sort of God, but they can be introduced by using the Deistic God, who is an impersonal being that started the universe and then left everything alone within this creation.   A deistic god does not push a specific worldview per say, but it does point toward a supernatural being that cannot be scientifically proven in the classical sense, so some people may already be throwing up their hands and claim multiple problems with teaching these ideas in school. The two big objections that pop into my head are by usi
Read more

Thoughts on the Problem of Animal Suffering

              YouTube atheist Cosmic Skeptic uploaded a video entitled “Christianity’s Biggest Problem”. He definitely caught my attention for the title and because I recently gained some respect for Alex as he had a recent discussion with William Lane Craig and that discussion turned out very well. To spoil Alex’s cryptic surprise, he believes that Christianity’s biggest problem is the problem of animal suffering. In Alex’s view, he believes that because animals experience gratuitous suffering (resource depletion, death in wildfires, long drawn out deaths to predators) that it is evidence that God does not exist, and that Christianity is false. I admit that I hadn’t really considered this problem, so I have gone looking for resources, and I would like to present what I have found here as possible avenues in which we can answer this particular problem. The first line of response I am borrowing Sean Luke, a comember of CAA: Christian Apologetics Alliance on Facebook, who left this com
Read more