Lines of Evidence to Support the Resurrection
I have recently done a series on an intro to apologetics, and in that series I took a look at some of the objections to the resurrection, but not necessarily evidences for the resurrection itself. I had left that to the people who have laid out some awesome evidences for the resurrection, such as Dr. Gary Habermas, Lee Strobel, and others. Recently, I saw a YouTube story, those short little snippets, pop up in my feed from Godless Engineer. He had a ten second clip of himself railing against Christian apologists saying that we have very weak lines of evidence to support the resurrection and that we would be laughed at to use them anywhere else, and cited the principle of embarrassment of the gospel authors as an example. For those who haven’t heard of this, the principle of embarrassment has been used by apologists to demonstrate the validity of scriptures, because the gospel authors wrote themselves as bumbling fools in the face of Jesus, and they reported other event